AU or Not AU?

The bread and butter!

Moderators: justTripn, Elessar, dark_rain

User avatar
WarpGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 9885
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: In A State Of Constant Confusion

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby WarpGirl » Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:53 pm

I don't think Archer would make a good partner for anyone. He's too isolated in himself, in general. Some people are not suited to relationships. A story where T'Pol rejects Archer sounds interesting. The thing is, I want her to sound like T'Pol not some stanger.
Some of these people haven't taken their medication. Let's see what happens now...
Donna Moss: The West Wing


And by people WG had herself in mind, but then the quote would have been ruined.
Fics
May We Together Become Greater Than The Sum Of Us
*Rights,* Wrongs, and Choices

Dinah
Commander
Commander
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 2:32 pm
Show On Map: No
Location: Indiana

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby Dinah » Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:06 pm

Honeybee, I thought you did an absolutely marvelous job of explaining things in "Dusk." The romance you created made perfect sense and was far more poignant than anything Sussman dreamed up.

Looking at things from Archer's viewpoint, he wakes up every day and he's either confined to his quarters (Earth is destroyed, someone else is sitting in his chair, and he's completely out of the loop in terms of the command structure -- people are polite, somewhat uncomfortable around you and no one pays attention to you or what you have to say) or your planetside (Earth is destroyed, you're not on board Enterprise where you should be, someone else is in command, and you're completely removed from your comfort zone -- and once again no one pays attention to what you or what have to say). How could any writer see this scenario as the basis for a great romance?

I don't know about Archer, but if someone told me what T'Pol tells Archer every day, I'd be pretty upset. I wouldn't feel better in 30 minutes or an hour or even twelve hours. And I certainly wouldn't be looking for romance. And any feelings you might generate on day one are gone by day two. There could never be a romance between Archer and T'Pol, but Archer's illness makes it impossible for a romance to develop. So unless they're in a passionate romance when the anomaly hits, their romance could never "evolve." Phlox's statement to T'Pol could never be about Archer; it had to refer to the current captain of Enterprise, Tucker.

User avatar
honeybee
Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1644
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:09 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby honeybee » Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:10 am

it had to refer to the current captain of Enterprise, Tucker.


I suppose you could interpret it that way - but I think it's clear that both Sussman and Phlox meant Archer. But I interpret that line as Phlox being wrong. In Dusk, Soval and Phlox, and we can assume others, believe that T'Pol is involved with Archer. They are just wrong. Malcolm, Hoshi and most of the active crew are the ones that know the truth. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :lol:
Now Playing: Embers, Spark, Flame the Prequel to Family Secrets

Image

Avatar made by Hopeful Romantic! Thanks!

User avatar
Alelou
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 7894
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:05 pm
Twitter username: @sheerhubris
Show On Map: No
Location: Upstate New York
Contact:

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby Alelou » Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:42 am

Yep, I like Honeybee's version. I really do think there's no other way of interpreting how Phlox meant it, but T'Pol's responding look certainly invites the possibility that she's burying some un-Vulcan revulsion at the idea.
OMG, ANOTHER new chapter! NORTH STAR Chapter 28
Image.Image
Read opening chapters free at Amazon (US): The Awful Mess: A Love Story
Blog: Sheer Hubris Press / Twitter: @sheerhubris / Facebook: Sandra Hutchison

User avatar
WarpGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 9885
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: In A State Of Constant Confusion

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby WarpGirl » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:38 am

Honeybee, Dinah you're both brilliant!
Some of these people haven't taken their medication. Let's see what happens now...
Donna Moss: The West Wing


And by people WG had herself in mind, but then the quote would have been ruined.
Fics
May We Together Become Greater Than The Sum Of Us
*Rights,* Wrongs, and Choices

User avatar
Reanok
Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1272
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 5:34 pm
Show On Map: No

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby Reanok » Fri Oct 23, 2009 3:46 am

Well said Dinah& Honeybee i really think you got to the heart of what the story is all about.

User avatar
Asso
Site Donor
Posts: 6336
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:13 am
Show On Map: No
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby Asso » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:10 pm

I posted this as a comment on your latest story, "Dusk", but I wanted also people can read it here.

"Twilight" is a strange episode in my opinion. I don't want to speak of its qualities, better not to talk about that.
But, what hell meant it? Or rather, what hell would it have wanted to mean?
An AU where T'Pol and Archer would love each other?
It doesn't seems so, to me.
An AU where T'Pol sacrifice herself for Archer in the name of the friendship between her and him? In the name of the consideration that his illness is indirectly due to her, because Archer didn't leave her when the anomaly struck?
Damn, what a logical Vulcan, I would say, in this case.
More. Is "Twilight" an AU of the lost opportunities? Of what could happen and, at the same time, of what couldn't happen?
Honestly, for me "Twilight" is only an enormous mess, furthermore showed just when spectators are expecting for the series' follow-on, and it breaks off stupidly the tension.
So, considering these premises from my part, you, Honeybee, have to understand the real apprehension with wich I approached this story, and even more in the light of the fact that, as you know, AU are not exactly my forte.

OKAY. All that said, thank goodness I read this first chapter. BRAVO! :D
I don't want to read your story on FFNET. I prefer to discover every chapter here, as you will post them on TS. :lol:
Well yes. I continue to write. And on Fanfiction.Net, for those who want, it is possible to cast a glance at my latest efforts. We arrived to
The Ears of the Elves, chapter Forty-four


And here is the beginning of the whole story.
Image

But, I must say, you could also find something else on Fanfiction.net written by me. If you want.

User avatar
WarpGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 9885
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: In A State Of Constant Confusion

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby WarpGirl » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:29 pm

Part of the reason I don't get Twilight is because T'Pol isn't exactly a logical Vulcan in her reasoning. But what else is new, in season 3 they tried to rip any trace of a logical Vulcan from her. Let's just mention that Robbie McNiell directed, and he is absolutely brilliant at that. :loveeyes:
Some of these people haven't taken their medication. Let's see what happens now...
Donna Moss: The West Wing


And by people WG had herself in mind, but then the quote would have been ruined.
Fics
May We Together Become Greater Than The Sum Of Us
*Rights,* Wrongs, and Choices

User avatar
honeybee
Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1644
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:09 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby honeybee » Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:14 pm

Well, I do look forward to all your comments on Dusk, Asso. I'm glad you liked the story so far - we shall see. There are number of things that happen - especially to the other crew members - that I am curious to see your reaction to as well.

And Warpgirl, I think on one level in Twilight, T'Pol is being very Vulcan. She believes Archer spared her from the anomaly and the illness that plagues him. So, she believes caring for him is her duty. That I get, as Vulcans are very much about honor. Twisting that into romantic feelings doesn't quite set as well with me, thus my "episode" fix.
Now Playing: Embers, Spark, Flame the Prequel to Family Secrets

Image

Avatar made by Hopeful Romantic! Thanks!

User avatar
WarpGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 9885
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: In A State Of Constant Confusion

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby WarpGirl » Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:22 pm

Oh yes I agree that to her that it would be her duty to take care of Archer ABSOLUTELY! But I do not believe that she would think it was logical to blame herself for his illness. That's a totally different thing. But that's what TPTB portrayed at least it looked that way from the synonpses, and everything I read. :dunno: Anyway you're still brilliant so what does it matter. ;-)
Some of these people haven't taken their medication. Let's see what happens now...
Donna Moss: The West Wing


And by people WG had herself in mind, but then the quote would have been ruined.
Fics
May We Together Become Greater Than The Sum Of Us
*Rights,* Wrongs, and Choices

User avatar
Pitseleh
Commander
Commander
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:04 am
Location: Costa Rica
Contact:

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby Pitseleh » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:14 pm

To answer the original question, I don't have a problem with AUs or MUs as long as they are well written. As Escriba stated a couple of pages ago, most fic ends up being AU either way, unless they are episode additions that manage to fit within canon. Some of my favorite fics of all time, like HopefulRomantic's Reconnecting series, or Rigil Kent's Endeavour series are AUs, and they are outstanding, even if they are poles apart. Then, you could always claim that fics that take place post-Terra Prime are not AUs since *the_abomination* is not ENT's real finale, but that would be a personal opinion (one which my father and I share).

Regarding Twilight, I watched it once or twice, and I don't like it. Even though the implication of an Archer and T'Pol relationship is downplayed, it is still creepy. First of all, I never thought those two would be compatible besides a friendship. Second, the idea of a romance with a person who is disconnected from his reality and has no memory of any development in any interactions with someone else makes no sense whatsoever. Third, T'Pol's actions during the episode are questionable and quite illogical; the whole thing is too close to OOC for the resident Vulcan.
Image for avatar found in Enterprise Oddities; created by ivymae

User avatar
WarpGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 9885
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: In A State Of Constant Confusion

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby WarpGirl » Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:06 pm

I think in season three nobody was really concerned with keeping T'Pol in character as the "resident Vulcan" which ticks me off. BUT you're nicer about an Archer/T'Pol friendship. I don't even see a real true healthy friendship between them.
Some of these people haven't taken their medication. Let's see what happens now...
Donna Moss: The West Wing


And by people WG had herself in mind, but then the quote would have been ruined.
Fics
May We Together Become Greater Than The Sum Of Us
*Rights,* Wrongs, and Choices

User avatar
Pitseleh
Commander
Commander
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:04 am
Location: Costa Rica
Contact:

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby Pitseleh » Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:13 pm

True, T'Pol was all over the place starting on Season 3. I could go on a very long rant about how T'Pol, my favorite character, was criminally abused as a character during the entire show. I have to admit that my respect for Jolene Blalock increased since she actually managed to play a character that was heading one direction one day and an entirely different direction the other day.

About T'Pol's interactions with Archer, I want to think that characters can develop past their flaws, which is why I give the possibility of a friendship between them credit. What makes this difficult, though, is that Archer was never really shown trying to learn about T'Pol as much as he was shown attempting to make T'Pol accept Human culture. While Trip did show interest in her by trying to integrate her to the crew and learning about her culture later on the show, that was not Archer's case. I actually thought it was very sad how T'Pol had become such a different person from whom she once was in Twilight. Down the road, I think that's what would have to happen for an Archer/T'Pol relationship, as disgusting as it is to me, to work: she'd have to sacrifice way too much of herself.
Image for avatar found in Enterprise Oddities; created by ivymae

User avatar
WarpGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 9885
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: In A State Of Constant Confusion

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby WarpGirl » Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:14 pm

Oh that's too perfect! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Some of these people haven't taken their medication. Let's see what happens now...
Donna Moss: The West Wing


And by people WG had herself in mind, but then the quote would have been ruined.
Fics
May We Together Become Greater Than The Sum Of Us
*Rights,* Wrongs, and Choices

User avatar
Silverbullet
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 3507
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 4:38 pm
Show On Map: No
Location: Casa Grande , Arizona

Re: AU or Not AU?

Postby Silverbullet » Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:59 pm

I coulld never warm to the Archer Character. In RU, AU or MU. He was never sympathetic in my view. I guess it is the Character was seen too much we never got a rest from him. Also the other Characters were diiminshed so he could be made to look larger. The sidekick Polly irritated me as it was not necessary. Too he became Super Archer by Season three probablly before that.

For the life of me I simply cannnot see T-Pol in any situation becoming romanticaly involved with Archer. I cannot see her abidcating her duty to the Eterprise, Crew, and Mission to care for Archer as a duty. After all "the needs of the many....." take precedence for a Vulcan.
I am Retired. Having a good time IS my job


Image


Return to “Trip and T'Pol Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests