![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
on memory alpha (they supposed to respect canon doesnt look to to me that way XD).
It would be great if you boys and girls could read it and tell me your opinion and perhaps tell me if i should improve some things in the argumentation:
Any kind of media which represents a historical event must be based
on a historical record. The holodeck program in These are the voyages is
such a media. Also every discussion of Riker and Troi about Trips death or more generally the events represented by the holodeck program
must be based on a historical record (there werent there after all). Therefore the logical consequence is that the historical records
at the year 2370 state that Charles Tucker III died in 2161. There is however
no proof that Charles Tucker III died in 2161. This means that the state of Charles Tucker III
is unknown. In order to follow this argumentation it is important to differentiate historie
as described in the Star Trek universe and actual canon facts. Canon is that
the historical records as of 2370(date at which the events of these are the voyages take place)
state that Charles Tucker III died in 2161, not more not less.The fate of Charles Tucker III (the real one not the historical person)
is therefore unknown. (Same goes for the romance with T'Pol)
Therefore i would ask the authors of this article to rectify these canon violations.
As a side note: Alelou has with "having his baby" a really wonderful setup (perhaps minor changes are needed to it) lined up
for a great final fix (sequel to "having his baby"). If Alelou wants to know more about it just write me a message.