Elessar wrote:Lady Rainbow wrote:Lys wrote:RE: Hatchery and the MACOs. I know soldiers are SUPPOSED to follow orders. That what makes Hayes a good MACO...he follows orders. The problem is when you follow orders that are obviously so screwed up...Hayes follows 'em anyway. That's how he's been trained and if he'd had any second thoughts, he'd probably convinced himself that at least he did his job. Not to defend the MACOs ('cause, yeah, it makes 'em seem like stupid automatons), but I can understand why Hayes and Malcolm ended up on different sides of the mutiny. Malcolm, at least, questions orders that doesn't make sense.
And that's a really poor misunderstanding of military officers that I can't believe still perpetuates. Even the Marines - and I say
even because people tend to think of the Marines like the MACOs in the sense that they would follow orders to the letter with blinders on, more than any other branch, without regard to any mitigating circumstances, like because Marines are all hard-charging jarheads that don't think. To a lot of people the phrase "Marine officer" sounds like an oxymoron for that reason, and it's in line with this perception of military as brainwashed automotons that don't think for themselves. As far as I am aware based on my relationships with Army officers from NCOs in the range of SFC and Sergeant Major and commissioned officers in the range of LtCol and Col, AND Marine officers from 2nd Lt to Capt, an officer is trained and expected to take initiative when orders don't make sense or when your superior is compromised or when higher orders are merely unavailable. They would not be able to function without that skill. Popular media seems to often represent the "your CO has gone mad" scenario as if it's something that the training philosophy just never thought of. So everybody is all "oh my god, our captain is nuts, omg omg omg what do we do?" when in reality the scenario of the CO that becomes unfit for duty is historically not uncommon and because it's so difficult to work with - i.e., relieving your commanding officer of duty and facing possible court martial of your superiors don't later find in your favor - it's covered in officer training in extreme detail. It's a very serious part of every officer's training - and should be written as such for MACOs, too.
Elessar, when I was in Navy ROTC at Virginia Tech (I was in the VT Corps of Cadets...yes, I nearly went into the military, until I blew out my knee during a PT run and couldn't pass the physical...
), my neighbor was in Marine ROTC. She was one of the nicest, most honorable people I knew, but when it came to business, she was all business, and I respected her for that. And my brother (who's a medical corpsman) worked with the Marines in Iraq for 8 months...he'd been stationed at Camp Lejeune, NC for 5 years and he had plenty of friends there.
That's why I winced at the "the jarhead always follows stupid orders and doesn't think" attitude. It made Hayes look like a brainless idiot and it definitely perpetuated the stereotype you brought up. (Didn't mean to insult you there, Elessar. Sorry.)
(((Elessar))))