WarpGirl wrote:IDK I find it sad that if two men hug each other with both arms and for more than 10 seconds it turns into a "gay subtext" thing. I find it sad that if I help a friend with sunscreen on his back I've got to be careful otherwise I'm suddenly trying to get him. Or in a compromising situation.
I agree that we are sensual creatures, and touch is vital. I just find it supremely irritating when comfort is automatically taken into the erotic, and affection is mistaken for a sexual invitation.
I don't see it that way and I don't think it is really that bad in all parts of the world. It's also a cultural thing. For instance in Europe men hugging is not that uncommon and certainly doesn't carry a gay conotation. My experience is that it tends to be the way you describe it in societies, which are either sexually repressed or prude. Take the US of Americaland for instance. Here we have the worlds biggest producer of pornographic material, yet you'll hardly see a semi-nude person on screen (someone notice that bed sheets in american movies always seem to be L-shaped? Always covers the female, but for the male it only suffices up to the waist )
Over here you'd mistake a normal free-TV channel for a pr0n-channel. Naked persons are nothing uncommon in films shown after 2pm. Go to a German beach in summer and you'll hardly see a female wearing a bikini top and none of the males is walking around with a raging hard-on. If a society deals with human sexuality openly, such mistaken associations as you describe them, don't usually happen.